Chinese university applies for undersea cable cutter patent — device developed by coastal university located across the sea from Taiwan

Large anchor on a sandy seafloor next to a coral reef in Asia
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

A team of engineers from Lishui University, located in the coastal Zhejiang province in China, applied for a patent for a “dragging type submarine cable cutting device” in 2020. According to Newsweek, which reviewed the documents, the patent application is based on another device developed in the late 2000s by marine engineers the State Oceanic Administration of China (SOA) in the South China Sea described as an “ocean towing type cutting device.” However, records reveal that both applications were either turned down or retracted, although no reason was given for these actions.

This revelation comes after several months of reports regarding undersea cable damage incidents, suspected to have been committed by vessels connected to China and Russia. The latest cable damage incident, reported during the first week of January, involved the Chinese freighter Shunxing39 cutting through the Trans-Pacific Express Cable System that directly connects Taiwan to the U.S. West Coast, Japan, South Korea, and China.

“With the development of science and technology, more and more submarine cables and communication cables are laid on the seabed of all parts of the world and the cables need to be cut off in some emergency situations,” the Lishui University authors wrote in their patent application. “The traditional cutting method needs first to detect the position of the cables, then excavate and salvage them for cutting. This process is complex, a lot of expensive equipment is needed, and the cost is too high. There is a need for a fast, low-cost cutting apparatus for submarine cables to accomplish this task.” On the other hand, the rationale for the SOA’s patent application is the need to destroy illegal cables off China.

Nearly 95% of global communication goes through undersea cable, making this infrastructure crucial to how our society operates today. More than just voice communications, these submarine wires also carry data and are the physical embodiment of the World Wide Web. Essentially, it’s the internet. Some undersea cables also carry power, which could affect a country’s national grid.

The mere existence of these patent applications is troubling, said one Norwegian expert. They said that these tools worked randomly at best and could damage other useful cables. Benjamin Schmitt of the University of Pennsylvania’s Kleinman Center for Energy Policy also told Newsweek, “The fact that there are multiple technical patents that Chinese engineers applied for to conduct such a subsea cable cutting operation only adds to the suspicion that Beijing may have not only the motivation but also is actively developing technical options for completing these sort of subsea warfare operations in the future.”

This capability has certainly got Taiwan worried, especially as it’s an island that relies on these undersea cables to communicate with the rest of the world. This is especially true as these cable-cutting incidents happen in international waters and are conducted by purportedly civilian ships with muddy registration and ownership records. While work on naval drones to monitor and protect undersea cables is underway, it would likely take years, if not decades, to be able to fully deploy a system such as this to protect all submarine cables.

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • bit_user
    This is hilarious!
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    or retracted

    at least publicly..everyone knows every nation keeps stuff going even if they are publicly not supportive of idea.
    Reply
  • evdjj3j
    Why would anyone respect Chinese patents?
    Reply
  • OneMoreUser
    This needs filing in the 'You can't make this stuff up'-category.
    Reply
  • chaz_music
    evdjj3j said:
    Why would anyone respect Chinese patents?

    And in this case, I suspect that is the reason the Chinese government rejected the patent. Because they wanted to use it outright without pesky hindrance.

    So now the sea cables will need some sort of conduit or other kind of armor / protection. This includes power cables ($$$$$).
    Reply
  • sjw1226
    They said it's for "emergency reasons" then why don't they cut the cable on land before it goes into the sea/ocean? This is just an excuse for communication sabotage.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    chaz_music said:
    So now the sea cables will need some sort of conduit or other kind of armor / protection. This includes power cables ($$$$$).
    What they should do is just bury the equivalent of an anchor chain far enough on either side of a route where cables are buried that if any ship attempts an anchor-drag, it's likely to get its anchor snapped off before it hits the target.

    One question I've had is how long ship anchor chains are. Because, you only have to worry about that in water shallow enough for them to reach. Not in the deep sea (although that probably runs into other problems, like ocean currents).

    Lastly, all of the concern over anchor drags become somewhat moot, if a bad actor decides to send an underwater drone to do the job. Even if you try to armor your cable, I'm sure there's an amount explosives it could use to defeat any practical amount of armor. It's thought that explosives were used to sabotage that Nordstream 2 pipeline, so not a theoretical problem.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    sjw1226 said:
    They said it's for "emergency reasons" then why don't they cut the cable on land before it goes into the sea/ocean? This is just an excuse for communication sabotage.
    I think that's pretty transparent.

    One interpretation might be that they didn't want their government to do things like this. However, they cannot speak out against it. So, they do the next best thing, which is to publicly do something in support of it which essentially "outs" their government's position on the matter, while minimizing risk to themselves. Or maybe I'm giving them too much credit.
    Reply
  • trica
    Well, Xi will have no room to complain when every Chinese ship gets followed and watched from the moment it leaves Chinese waters going forward.
    Reply
  • tamalero
    evdjj3j said:
    Why would anyone respect Chinese patents?
    sounds more like for bragging rights, not protection lol.
    Reply