Intel Arc B570 review featuring the ASRock Challenger OC: A decent budget option with a few deep cuts

Trimming performance and price on the BMG-G21 GPU.

ASRock Arc B570 Challenger OC
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

It's nice to see a new graphics card that has a theoretically budget price of $219. We'll have to wait and see how things develop over time, though, as the Arc B580 has been sold out and overpriced basically since it launched last month. Hopefully things calm down soon and prices drop to MSRP levels.

Could the same thing happen to the Arc B570? Yes, but it probably won't be as severe. The B580 ends up as the more desirable card, since performance scales more than the price. For most graphics cards, you'll typically pay 20% more money for 10% more performance, rather than 12% more money for 18% more performance.

We haven't talked a lot about drivers this time, but as with our B580 testing, there are definitely anomalies and issues that still need fixing. Some games underperform, other crash on a regular basis. This is the Intel "fine wine" argument where performance and compatibility improve over time. But most people would likely prefer having something work properly from the start.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Battlemage in many ways feels like a rehash of the Alchemist launch. It's faster than the outgoing AMD and Nvidia GPUs, but new models are coming soon. But we don't expect Nvidia's future RTX 5060 to cost less than $300, and even AMD's RX 9060 may start at $300. That leaves the sub-$250 and "closer to $200" market to the Arc B570 by default.

It still has to contend with older model cards, but the RX 6600 isn't able to keep pace. Even in rasterization games, the B570 ends up being almost 30% faster than the 6600, while costing about 16% more. So unless prices on the RX 6600 drop another $20 or more, the B570 wins that comparison.

It also wins against the RX 7600. It's only slightly faster in general, and tied at 1080p medium, but it costs $30 less. Basically, the Arc B570 ends up standing alone as a brand new chip that only costs $220. There's nothing else released in the past two years that sits in that price bracket.

If you're mostly concerned with price and value rather than performance and compatibility, the Arc B570 should be a reasonable option. But if you can afford the extra $30 — and find a B580 in stock for that price — its sibling GPU remains the better option.

Jarred Walton

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • Gururu
    If this becomes more available than the b580, I would happily put this into my little brother or sister's new build. $200-250 is absolutely budget and I guess the performance is better than integrated solutions.
    Reply
  • GenericUser2001
    Any thoughts on doing a performance test of this and the B580 using a more budget processor? Quite a few other websites have been retesting the B580 and found that it has some sort of driver overhead issues, and when paired with more modest CPU like a Ryzen 5600 the B580 often ends up falling behind a Radeon 7600 or Geforce 4060 on the same games it leads in when paired with a high end CPU.
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    Thanks for the review Jarred, I like that you don’t skip higher resolutions and RT which might not be as relevant for a budget GPU but in my opinion they offer good insight on overall improvement gen-on-gen.

    The price point is pretty good and I think many buyers would rather buy a new release with potential to get higher performance in the future with better drivers than buying a used card or an older generation card for the same money and performance.
    Reply
  • das_stig
    am I misinterpreting the chart or why buy a B5x0 when the A7x0 is superior in most things including price, except for extra wattage and boost clock?
    Reply
  • Notton
    das_stig said:
    am I misinterpreting the chart or why buy a B5x0 when the A7x0 is superior in most things including price, except for extra wattage and boost clock?
    If you're looking at the same charts I am looking at, yes.
    B570 > A750, B580 > A770 at a majority of games.
    There are some exceptions where this flips around on some settings, like TLoU 1080p ultra, but reverts to B570 being dominant at 1080p medium.
    Reply
  • Giroro
    B570 Doesn't really outperform an RTX 3060. That a bummer, even at $200.
    Reply
  • eye4bear
    Day before yesterday I managed to order and pick-up after work one of only 3 B580s at the Miami Micro Center, and the other two were gone yesterday on their web-site. Worked late last evening, so haven't had a chance yet to install it. Replacing an Arc A380. If I find out anything interesting, will let you all know.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    GenericUser2001 said:
    Any thoughts on doing a performance test of this and the B580 using a more budget processor? Quite a few other websites have been retesting the B580 and found that it has some sort of driver overhead issues, and when paired with more modest CPU like a Ryzen 5600 the B580 often ends up falling behind a Radeon 7600 or Geforce 4060 on the same games it leads in when paired with a high end CPU.
    It all takes time, the one thing I definitely don't have right now. There's a reason RTX 3050 isn't in the charts either. LOL. But eventually, it's something I'd like to investigate... and will probably be stale before I could get around to it. Because it's time to start testing the extreme GPUs in preparation for RTX 5090 and 5080. And after that? The high-end cards in preparation for RTX 5070 Ti and 5070, plus RX 9070 XT and 9070.

    I should have more ability to do off the beaten path testing in about two months, in other words. <sigh> But it's good to be busy, even if we don't have enough time between getting cards and the launch dates.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    Thanks for the comprehensive data as always, Jarred.

    And kind of sad the conclusion from most people reviewing it is: "well, the B580 is the better pick if you can find it at MSRP". I wonder if Intel can make this card hit a lower price point? I mean, without actually losing money. Sounds tricky to do.

    And I'm surprised OBS didn't work for you. I would have imagined they'd be exposing the capabilities of Battlemage the same way as Alchemist for the encoders. Well, I hope a patch is coming, since that's a big miss for me at least :(

    Regards.
    Reply
  • rluker5
    I've got a B580 and noticed a couple of bugs in overclocking.
    1. my PC doesn't like to wake from sleep with an overclock applied to the B580. It will wake, not be happy and restart which turns off the oc. No problem if no oc. I am running a pretty heavy undervolt on my 13900kf and it is stable in everything else, but maybe is giving this particular boot issue. Also not a fresh OS install.
    2. The ram oc usually doesn't take 21 Gbs right away. I have to do 20, sometimes 20.1 then it takes 21 and the change shows up in GPUZ and everything else.

    I just thought of the ram oc finickyness reading this article and how I would want to oc vram if I had a B570. Hopefully few others have these issues but I'm seeing them so I brought them up.

    Also my B580 has been a bunch faster than my A750 in the few games I've played on it.
    Reply