Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
ASRock Arc B570 Challenger OC
Intel isn't making any reference Arc B570 cards, leaving that to its partners. It sent us an ASRock Arc B570 Challenger OC for this launch review, and we have some other B570 cards incoming... but those will probably have to wait until after we've cleared the RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 launches. Indications so far are that the various partner cards will all perform similarly, so it really comes down to pricing and aesthetics.
The primary attraction for the Battlemage GPUs will be their value proposition. Arc B580 is a great option for $249. At the current higher demand and backorder prices of $350 or more, though, it's nowhere near as interesting. The same goes for the Arc B570. It really needs to sell for $219, not $249 or $269.
We assume the ASRock Challenger OC will be a base MSRP model, as that's usually how ASRock approaches GPUs — the Phantom Gaming, Steel Legend, and Taichi brands are reserved for higher spec models with more RGB lighting. The Challenger B570 does have a small RGB strip, but otherwise it's a relatively barebones design.
ASRock's Arc B570 Challenger OC measures 248x130x42 mm and weighs 721g. It's a reasonably compact design in terms of the length, but it's taller than many lower tier cards. While it's a 2-slot card, there's also a metal backplate that makes it slightly thicker than some graphics cards and could preclude the use of an adjacent slot above the primary x16 slot (if you have a motherboard with such a configuration).
ASRock equips the Challenger with two older style 95mm custom fans, without the integrated rims that have become common on higher quality GPUs. We didn't encounter any issues with keeping the card cool and reasonably quiet, but these feel more like leftover fans from several years ago rather than quality components. You get what you pay for, in other words.
The Challenger comes with the usual complement of three DisplayPort 2.1 outputs and a single HDMI 2.1 port. We assume it's similar to the B580 LE in that one of the DP2.1 outputs supports UHBR13.5 (54 Gbps) while the other two are UHBR10, but we don't have a DP2.1 monitor for testing. Instead, we're using a 4K 240 Hz display that leverages DSC (Display Stream Compression) and runs on the older DP1.4a standard.
The B570 has an official TBP (Total Board Power) rating of 150W, and ASRock provides a single 8-pin PCIe graphics power connector. That can deliver up to 150W on its own, with an additional 75W provided by the x16 slot, so there should be ample margins for any potential overclocking.
- MORE: Best Graphics Cards
- MORE: GPU Benchmarks and Hierarchy
- MORE: All Graphics Content
Current page: ASRock Arc B570 Challenger OC
Prev Page Intel Arc B570 Review Next Page Intel Arc B570 Test SetupJarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.
-
Gururu If this becomes more available than the b580, I would happily put this into my little brother or sister's new build. $200-250 is absolutely budget and I guess the performance is better than integrated solutions.Reply -
GenericUser2001 Any thoughts on doing a performance test of this and the B580 using a more budget processor? Quite a few other websites have been retesting the B580 and found that it has some sort of driver overhead issues, and when paired with more modest CPU like a Ryzen 5600 the B580 often ends up falling behind a Radeon 7600 or Geforce 4060 on the same games it leads in when paired with a high end CPU.Reply -
Elusive Ruse Thanks for the review Jarred, I like that you don’t skip higher resolutions and RT which might not be as relevant for a budget GPU but in my opinion they offer good insight on overall improvement gen-on-gen.Reply
The price point is pretty good and I think many buyers would rather buy a new release with potential to get higher performance in the future with better drivers than buying a used card or an older generation card for the same money and performance. -
das_stig am I misinterpreting the chart or why buy a B5x0 when the A7x0 is superior in most things including price, except for extra wattage and boost clock?Reply -
Notton
If you're looking at the same charts I am looking at, yes.das_stig said:am I misinterpreting the chart or why buy a B5x0 when the A7x0 is superior in most things including price, except for extra wattage and boost clock?
B570 > A750, B580 > A770 at a majority of games.
There are some exceptions where this flips around on some settings, like TLoU 1080p ultra, but reverts to B570 being dominant at 1080p medium. -
eye4bear Day before yesterday I managed to order and pick-up after work one of only 3 B580s at the Miami Micro Center, and the other two were gone yesterday on their web-site. Worked late last evening, so haven't had a chance yet to install it. Replacing an Arc A380. If I find out anything interesting, will let you all know.Reply -
JarredWaltonGPU
It all takes time, the one thing I definitely don't have right now. There's a reason RTX 3050 isn't in the charts either. LOL. But eventually, it's something I'd like to investigate... and will probably be stale before I could get around to it. Because it's time to start testing the extreme GPUs in preparation for RTX 5090 and 5080. And after that? The high-end cards in preparation for RTX 5070 Ti and 5070, plus RX 9070 XT and 9070.GenericUser2001 said:Any thoughts on doing a performance test of this and the B580 using a more budget processor? Quite a few other websites have been retesting the B580 and found that it has some sort of driver overhead issues, and when paired with more modest CPU like a Ryzen 5600 the B580 often ends up falling behind a Radeon 7600 or Geforce 4060 on the same games it leads in when paired with a high end CPU.
I should have more ability to do off the beaten path testing in about two months, in other words. <sigh> But it's good to be busy, even if we don't have enough time between getting cards and the launch dates. -
-Fran- Thanks for the comprehensive data as always, Jarred.Reply
And kind of sad the conclusion from most people reviewing it is: "well, the B580 is the better pick if you can find it at MSRP". I wonder if Intel can make this card hit a lower price point? I mean, without actually losing money. Sounds tricky to do.
And I'm surprised OBS didn't work for you. I would have imagined they'd be exposing the capabilities of Battlemage the same way as Alchemist for the encoders. Well, I hope a patch is coming, since that's a big miss for me at least :(
Regards. -
rluker5 I've got a B580 and noticed a couple of bugs in overclocking.Reply
1. my PC doesn't like to wake from sleep with an overclock applied to the B580. It will wake, not be happy and restart which turns off the oc. No problem if no oc. I am running a pretty heavy undervolt on my 13900kf and it is stable in everything else, but maybe is giving this particular boot issue. Also not a fresh OS install.
2. The ram oc usually doesn't take 21 Gbs right away. I have to do 20, sometimes 20.1 then it takes 21 and the change shows up in GPUZ and everything else.
I just thought of the ram oc finickyness reading this article and how I would want to oc vram if I had a B570. Hopefully few others have these issues but I'm seeing them so I brought them up.
Also my B580 has been a bunch faster than my A750 in the few games I've played on it.